Comments on: Nat, free but not free

By: monsterball

monsterball — Tue, 24 Jul 2007 09:08:03 +0000

Look at that scumbag silverwolf talking cock….totally ignoring world’s opinions that his country ..USA is the worst devils on Earth.
Religions…shit what does a country who try to rob other’s properties in disguised as world policeman…fair and just…knows about that.
Their religion is MONEY…in whatever forms to rob con or and steal from others.
Silverwolf have no shame….face like onion skin.
Decent Americans are humble..righteous and realizes who wrong their US govt. is…here he talks about Castro….Buddhism…and mock them.
Biggest cowards are the Americans…using all sorts of weapons to figt a battle with enemies armed with stones and old guns. Try doing that with China…their balls shrink!! What thick skinned person can talk like silverwolf…now also known as silverfish and silverfox…by his so call good friend..witsO….realising what a bloody bastard that silverwolf is. Never too late to learn…witsO.
Get lost silverwolf…..go back to your satanic country and teach your kind how great other cultures and people are away from USA….that is if your eyes are not blind….and your brain is not a pea.

By: silverwolf

silverwolf — Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:20:06 +0000

Rajah — Hinduism and Confucianism I could see possibly producing or fitting in with an authoritarian system. But Taoism? that marvelous anarchy of Lao-Tsu and Chuang-Tsu? The mountain laughter of Taoism will melt any form of fascism.

Benevolent authoritarianism? Hahaha. It reminds me of that Orwellian doublespeak of Reagan administration abomination Jean Kirkpatrick when she made her distinction between Latin American torture dictators who were “Authoritarian” and those who were “Totalitarian”. The “authoritarian” torturers were given foreign aid.

Yeh Chavez and Castro, another couple of scum-bags. Notice how Chavez made all those promises to help the poor, and after a few months in power he spends $4billion on new planes for the Air Fprce. In a country like Venezuala $4billion would have done a lot of good for the poor. He also just shut down the only TV station that wasn’t kissing his ass of the 3 in the country. It had been on the air for over 20 years. Then he’s feeling up Ahmenijad or whatever his name is.

Castro, who has had a cigar in his mouth for 30 years, throws people in jail for 30 years for pot (yep). Homosexuality is illegal. If you get aids, even if your a married nurse who accidently jabbed yourself, you’ll get taken away and segregated as if you were a prostitute. And then fools who are merely anti-American, idolize these thugs just because they are against America and Bush. Yeh, even under a capitalist fascist you have more freedom than under a communist fascist. But when I compare Castro to El Salvador, Guatamala,and Nicauragua under Somoza, to Chile and Argentina under the criminals Pinochet, Galtieri and Jorge Videla, then he is nothing. Castro never murdered and tortured people physically on that scale. He just tortured them mentally with his crappy socialist bullying. He’s terrible, but nothing like Roberto D’Aubisson, Somoza, Rios-Mont of Guatamala, Hugo Banzer of Bolivia, Alfredo Stroessner of Paraguay (Nazi protector), and on and on.

By: silverwolf

silverwolf — Fri, 20 Jul 2007 08:48:37 +0000

Oh, and if you ever get a chance, watch the movie “Cromwell” (1970) starring Richard Harris. It’s really good.

By: silverwolf

silverwolf — Fri, 20 Jul 2007 08:45:00 +0000

But your right too wits0 in your perception that islamofascism is a big threat to world peace. All the stuff that Bertrand Russell wrote about Christian fanaticism in the Middle Ages in Europe, is applicable to Islamic fanaticism now. It’s as if Christianity has mellowed out a lot and improved, while Islam has descend from a higher level of tolerance and philosophical sophistication to a pretty ugly intolerance. Remember, there has never been a religious pogrom in America that I can recall, and its overwhelming religious influence is Protestant Christianity. A big change came though, when Cromwell and the Puritans made their revolution in England. One of Cromwells first acts was to permit the Jews to return to England, because the Puritans were actually philo-Semites. They were fascinated by the Old Testament, and their top scholars were eager to discuss it with the top Jewish scholars and rabbis. So the Jews, who had been so cruelly persecuted on the continent, with the exception of Holland, suddenly found themselves welcome guests among philo-Semites. However Cromwell himself could have cared less. His motive was to gain economic strength.

By: Rajah

Rajah — Fri, 20 Jul 2007 08:43:43 +0000

“Silverwolf, I do not agree with your description of the US Rep party as “fascist”. It does not stand out to be particularly so named.” Wits0

I think Silverwolf exaggerates that to prove a point – and he’s right in my opinion.

Lest the FBI tracks our thoughts here (not yours Silverwolf for it does not matter to you), all I can say is that the US believes with 9/11 it has gained the moral leadership and the moral high ground in the struggle to free the world from tyranny and authoritarianism. What Americans fail to realize is that confucianism, hinduism and taosim are beliefs system more suited to the growth of authoritarianism than western style democracy.

Malaysia under Mahathir for one has been under a form of authoritarianism referred to as benevolent authoritarianism. But from there it is but one short step towards fascism and Malaysia has been on the proverbial slippery slopes ever since.

Towards the close of his premiership Mahathir has shaken hands with the likes of Castro and Hugo Chevez and of course Saddam after the first Gulf War – something his predecessors would never have done, right or wrong. That is how controversial the guy is and he is still at it even after stepping down.

His worst legacy has been to appoint Abdullah as his successor. Abdullah after some four years as PM failed to provide not just the leadership required but any form of leadership.

By: silverwolf

silverwolf — Fri, 20 Jul 2007 08:25:23 +0000

I do call Repubs fascist because it is a collectivist party now. It supports farm subsidies, it sides with the corporation against the rights of the individual like Mussolini (Italian fascism was really based on corporate socialism), it supports the death penalty, the military budget is 2/3rds waste so that is about $350 billion more of corporate welfare, and Bush’s signing of the medicare prescription benefit is a major expansion of the entitlement program that will add another 80-100 billion to the annual budget. They’re fascistic in their drug laws, in the desire to speed up death sentence executions in a country that has now found over 130 people who were on death row, to have been innocent through DNA. They talk individual rights, but they hate individual rights. They are corporate communists, i.e. fascists. But I realize fascism also has the image of the bully dictator, “the Italian jackanapes” as Churchill referred to Mussolini. The punk who got power. In that sense, no they are not quite there yet. But I do agree with you in that the Dems are worse because they are the party that should be against the death penalty. They are as liberal as Hitler’s anus. And they are the party that says to the individual, “We have the right to rob you in the name of social justice and the fact you protest shows that you are a wicked person.” Ayn Rand caught it very well in her novel, “Atlas Shrugged” although I didn’t like her contempt for poor people. When A and B get together and agree to rob C, its called a tax.

By: wits0

wits0 — Fri, 20 Jul 2007 07:41:18 +0000

Silverwolf, I do not agree with your description of the US Rep party as “fascist”. It does not stand out to be particularly so named.

The greatest world threat from fascism today is that islamofascism enabled through the call of ummah to unity for the purpose of confrontation with its enemies, real and imagine, and for ushering the grand delusion of world domination. This is aided by nonsensical liberal and European(useful idiots) multiculturalism and political correctness and a volcanic eruption is being built up consequently.

The conservatives would tend to address that early ; the liberals tend to be useful idiots. Yet it’s often the later that may eventually go overboard in overreacting afterwards.

By: silverwolf

silverwolf — Fri, 20 Jul 2007 06:31:37 +0000

Sorry that should have continued “Network news spent 80% of its time on U.S. news, and of the remaining 20%, 90% was the crisis de jour.”

By: silverwolf

silverwolf — Fri, 20 Jul 2007 06:23:28 +0000

I also forgot to point out earlier that that vision of the Palestinians and others dancing at the news of 9/11 was a big factor I think in why Americans were suddenly so silent and complicit when the Federal Police Agencies started arresting and it certainly sounds like violilating the civil rights of Arab and Muslim Americans. The fear too which said, “So what if a few, or even a lot of completely innocent people get taken in and held for a while. If they’re innocent they’ll get out fairly soon, anyway. Better to be safe than sorry.” So any legal niceties would have been completely overlooked. Remember too that the vast majority of Americans hear and care very little about foreign news. Network news TV always spent 80% of its time, and 90% of the foreign news would be the crisis de jour. In rural areas, huge numbers live in complete ignorance of what goes on in the world, as if America was on another planet. I don’t like that at all, but Americans are spoiled on violence. Outside of the veterans, they have never known what it was to be bombed or shelled. But they do have great fear of individual criminal violence, much more so in the metropolises. In the country they’re armed to the teeth, and they talk about the lack of order and crime, as if there about to be attacked, but murder is exceedingly rare in the county where I live because the trees are so beautiful, nature is all around, and all those natural fractile patterns are very soothing to the brain. It is the geometry of the architecture of modern cities, and the lack of rural vistas, that is so much responsible for the much higher level of violent crime in cities. I’m all with Bhutan for making it a crime to cut down a living tree (unless it is diseased, or a threat to human life. Also OK if your about to freeze to death). All trees are sacred.

By: silverwolf

silverwolf — Fri, 20 Jul 2007 05:44:28 +0000

Yes, thanks wits0, I’ll have to dig out my Goitein and read up on that wikipedia comment about the Moors loosing their tolerance. Been 20 years since I read it. Now which one of those 700 boxes of books in the garage did I put it in?