Altantuya: Baginda opens more cans of worms

Many cans of worms were open, but not all were fully open. More and more people seem to be involved in this case of the century. Will the DPP continue to maintain that no one else was involved?  Will the police start questioning more people whose names popped up in Baginda’s affidavit?

Abdul Razak Baginda revealed much in the Shah Alam court yesterday regarding his affair with Altantuya, but he did not elaborate how and why he had met her. He said that he first met Altantunya in Hongkong at the end of 2004, and in a relationship that lasted about eight months, Baginda said he gave her US$10,000 three to four times, and more.

He did not say however in what circumtances did he meet her? What is Baginda doing in Hongkong? Does he have a business dealing there? What business and is Altantuya involved in it?

Much had been mentioned about his involvement in the mysterious submarine deal but none of this had come out in his affidavit. Is Baginda telling us enough? 

In the affidavit, Baginda said on Oct 17 last year, he had gone out into town with his family members when he was told by a private investigator hired by him that Altantuya was causing a commotion outside his house in Bukit Damansara. Baginda said he called ASP Musa Safri to seek his help in removing her from his house. Policemen went there later to remove her. He said Musa also told him he would send Azilah to help him.

Why did the DPP say that “no one else” was involved in the case? Shouldn’t Musa be questioned too? What is his role in this case? What is Musa’s connection with Azilah? Why is he being kept away from questioning? Who were the policement who later went there to remove her?

Abdul razak said he went to the DPM’s office on an official matter on Oct 20, where he coincidently, met Musa. ”I asked Musa what had happenned after the second commotion. Musa replied that Azilah did not come back to him. I asked him again (Musa) but he did not say anything”.

If this is so, isn’t the DPM’s office implicated in this case as well? Can DPM Najib hold his in-elegant silence much longer? If he continues to be mum, will more souls be implicated? 

Abdul Razak said if he had really wanted to kill Altantuya, it would have been easier for him to pay a hired killer to eliminate her outside
Malaysia so that he would not be linked to it. The affidavit also included a statement Abdul Razak had given to the police on Oct 31. The judge said Baginda did not severe his ties with Azilah despite the latter boasting that he had killed 6 or 7 people.
But by not severing his ties with Azilah and admitting it to the judge, don’t you think he has established a motive for himself of wanting “to get rid” of Altantuya?

What is a “killer” policeman doing in the UTK, guarding DPMs and Ministers?

If it were true that Azilah had killed so many people, were there any reports filed against him?

Judge Segara asked the right question: “Why him? Is he the person to ask for help? How is he going to admonish her? The applicant should have gone to the Inspector-General of Police or the OCPD for protection. Anyway, he has got his own security.What’s his motive other than to get rid of her? So that he could sleep soundly after she disappears?.

Baginda said in his affidavit: “On Oct 20, a man, claiming to be a police officer, and two women came to my house. The man abused and threatened to harm my family. I went to lodge a police report on Oct 23″.

Who are these individuals? They are involved in the case as well but why did the DPP say there were no other involved other than those in the court house that day?